The Analysis and Design of the Sociophysical Environment

of Residential Facilities for the Elderly.

 

Central Michigan University

Running Head: Design of the Sociophysical Environment


Chapter I

Statement of the Problem

Background and Significance of Study

Summary

Hypothesis

Operational Definitions

Methodology

General Design and Procedures

Sample

Instrument

Procedures for Data Collection

Procedures for Data Analysis

Limitations

 

Chapter II

Review of the Literature

Theoretical Framework and Rationale

Summary

 

Chapter III

Study and Analysis of Data

Results

 

Chapter IV

Conclusions

References

 

Appendix

Test Instrument

List of Illustrations

Illustrations

Style Manual

 

Chapter I

Statement of Problem

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the type of social and

physical environment that residents in a custodial, retirement or

extended care facility prefer. A self-administered questionnaire was

used to obtain these data. Demographic and age information of the

participants was obtained at the time of the survey and was included in

the results.

Background and Significance of Study

As the population ages, the need for appropriately planned

facilities will increase greatly. If these facilities are planned with

the marketing concept in mind, i.e. ( customer driven ), then they

will provide the optimum satisfaction to the clients and the maximum

efficiency to the providers. Rodgers (1985), in The IBM Way states

that IBM has only three major operating principles. They are as

follows:

1. The individual must be respected.

2. The best service possible will be provided.

3. All tasks will be performed with the idea that they can be performed in

a superior fashion with zero defects.

We apply these principles to the construction and planning of the

custodial facilities by asking the potential consumers what they prefer

and then integrate this information into a compilation of theory and design.

Summary

While the aforementioned practices may seem time consuming and

impractical in our modern society, only when this type of effort is

expended can the consumer truly be served. The purpose of this study

is to compile information so that administrators can manage effectively

and planners and architects will be able to build or convert existing

facilities to meet the needs and desires of the frail and the elderly.

Hypothesis

The following hypotheses were examined to determine which type of

social and physical design would be the most desirable and advantageous

for the elderly and frail.

1) Every effort would be made to make the environment similar to

the ideal setting before retirement, i.e., maximum amount of

personal freedom with the minimum amount of personal energy

expenditure.

2) Every opportunity will be taken to encourage autonomy in all

aspects of day to day living, with an emphasis on self

management.

3) Every effort would be made to make to establish guidelines for

the social as well as the physical aspects of the facility,

i.e., How many rooms?, What type of building security?, What

types of recreational activities?, Should pets be allowed?,

etc. Definitions

The following operational definitions describe terms used in

this study:

1) Elderly - Those persons over the age of 65 or persons who

would be likely candidates for living in a custodial setting.

2) Frail - Those persons that cannot for reasons of ill health

or chronic illness, manage day to day activities without the

assistance of others.

3) Customer Driven - When the wants and desires of the customer

determine the characteristics of the product delivered to

them.

4) Lifecare - This is a general term that is used to define

residential facilities that emphasize minimal to full care to

the individual(s) during sickness and health. These services

can range from monthly on-site blood pressure clinics to full

service nursing home care.

5) Board and Care - This is a residential care facility generally

consisting of less than twenty five units. The level of care

is generally less than a skilled nursing facility, but more

than senior citizen apartment complexes.

Methodology

General Design and Procedures

The general design of this research project was an experimental,

self-administered, questionnaire. The survey consisted of five (5)

pages of questions that recorded the social and physical accommodation

preferences of the respondents. Attached to the questionnaire were

food coupons worth $1.00 to the participants.

The questions were arranged in ascending order according to

Maslow's " Hierarchy of Needs ", beginning with the physiological needs

and ending with the self-esteem needs.

Kagan (1968) stated that man is an organism that will strive

for higher goals or achievements only after the lower goals are

fulfilled. To elaborate:

1. " All humans are wanting beings. " What they want depends

on what they have already.

2. " A satisfied need is not a motivater of behavior, only

unsatisfied needs motivate behavior. " An organism that

requires air for its continued existence will only be

cognizant when it is deprived of it.

3. " Human needs are arranged in a series of levels, a

hierarchy of importance. "

 

                          MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS

 

                                    SELF-ACTUALIZATION

                                                ESTEEM

( INCLUDING SELF RESPECT AND FEELINGS OF SUCCESS )

                            BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE

               SAFETY ( SECURITY, ORDER AND STABILITY )

  PHYSIOLOGICAL ( SATISFACTION OF HUNGER, THIRST AND SEX )

 

 

At the lowest level of needs are the physiological needs. These

are the needs that must be satisfied to maintain life. The next level

consists of the safety needs. These are basically protection from

physical harm.

If physiological needs are relatively satisfied, the social needs

begin to motivate behavior. Examples of social needs are wanting to

belong to a larger group or individual, to associate, to gain

acceptance from their peers, and to give and receive friendship and

affection.

Esteem or egotistical needs are addressed at the next level of

hierarchy. The need for self-esteem, self-respect and independence is

developed at this level.

At the apex of the need hierarchy pyramid is the need for self-

realization or self-actualization. It is, in the broadest sense, a

creativeness in realizing one's fullest potentials, whatever they may

be.

The survey was designed to address these needs by beginning with

the safety needs and going towards self-actualization.

The questions relating to types of security required relate to the

safety needs, just as the questions relating to volunteer work relate

to self-actualization; to the "giving of one's self freely without

concern for physical or monetary reward."

Respondents indicated either Yes, No or Don't Know or chose a

response from the choices offered according to their preference in each

category. This study was experimental in nature because it asks

participants to study the questions and make a judgement based on their

own experiences.

 

Sample

The sample was sent to fifty (50) respondents whose ages varied

from thirty (30) to ninety (90) years of age. Their current residence

type varied from renting, to owning their own homes. Notice was given

to the participants that all data were confidential and would be used

only for the purposes of this study. ( See Appendix A for survey )

 

To be included within the studied group, the individuals must have:

1) Been able to read and write in English.

2) Been willing to participate in the study.

 

Test Instrument

The Needs Assessment Questionnaire was designed for this study by

the author of this proposal. The survey was of the self-administered,

experimental nature. Contained within this questionnaire was a general

background information survey.

 

Procedures for Data Collection

Questionnaires were hand delivered to two independent sites in

Ohio and Michigan. The respondents answered the questions and returned

them to the proper questionnaire facilitator. The facilitator then

insured that they were returned to the author either by mail or in

person.

Returned questionnaires were logged and filed until all of them

were returned or until the allocated time period was over. Finally,

all data were summarily analyzed.

 

Procedures for Data Analysis

Upon receipt of completed surveys, file numbers were be recorded

and logged. Data from surveys were analyzed as follows:

1) The mean, mode and median ages of the respondents were

calculated.

2) The total of the responses was compared to the individual

choices for each question and the results were displayed in

a histogram fashion or pie chart fashion. ( See Study and

Analysis of Results.)

 

Limitations

Since this was a self-designed instrument, no claims are made

for its reliability or validity. If the questions were answered

truthfully it addressed the underlying question of the study, namely,

what are the preferences in a varied population for the social and

physical characteristics of group housing?

As the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the

mean can be approximated by the " normal or bell-shaped distribution ".

This is true regardless of the distribution of the individual values in

the population. Statisticians have found that regardless of how

nonnormal the population distribution is, once the sample size is at

least 30, the distribution of the mean will be approximately normal.

General assumptions can then be made about the sample relative to the

overall population.

 

Chapter II

Review of the Literature

Theoretical Framework and Rationale

Goldberg (1986) says that during the next 35 years, industrial

nations like the USA can anticipate unprecedented growth in the elderly

population ( 65 years of age or older ). At the beginning of this

century less than 5% of the population were elderly. This proportion

has more than doubled since then and is expected to rise to as much as

14.6% by the year 2020.

Gurland et al (1981) stated that the primary reasons for this

increase were the control of neonatal and post partum death rates,

along with the a reduction in the birth rate.

In the state of Michigan, the effects of the burgeoning elderly

population are beginning to show. Twenty per cent of the state's 440

nursing homes were fined by the Department of Public Health from 1982

to 1985. Goldberg (1986) reports further that thousands of Michigan

residents are living in nursing homes that have been fined for violating

their patients' rights, abusing patients, and in some cases,

providing such poor care that they died.

The incidents range from the first fine brought by the State against

the Ambassador Nursing Home in 1982 for bathing a patient in

scalding water which eventually resulted in his death, to a fine in

1986 for serving melon with rind instead of fruit cups, as was originally

planned on the menu.

V. Katherine Gray et al (1985) describes a St. Paul Minnesota

study that examined why people moved into nursing or retirement homes.

There were two types of reasons; push and pull. Push factors were the

negative reasons that influenced their decisions like deteriorating

neighborhoods, crime, poor transportation and the cost of living. Pull

factors were the positive reasons for leaving like heated garages, snow

removal, improved proximity to mass transportation and health care.

She also wrote that 85 percent said that they would consider retirement

housing. Only 15 percent said that they would never consider it.

Parmiter (1984) describes the location characteristics of the

elderly population. 5 percent of the population are institutionalized,

7 to 8 percent are in an age segregated facility and 70 percent are

home owners. In addition, 60 to 80 percent of the homeowners own their

homes free and clear. Seiler (1986) indicates in his analysis of the population that

the elderly can be divided in three segments: the " go go " segment

(typically, ages 65 - 74 ), which is completely independent and

requires little in the way of specialized real estate or services;

the " slow go " segment (ages 75 - 84), which require some degree

of assistance and modified real estate services as well as specific

personal services and the " no go " segment (85 and Over), which is

highly dependent and requires specialized services and facilities.

Housing for the " go go " market is essentially the same as it is

for the slightly younger group of  " empty nesters " whose children have

left home. This type of unit is similar to the condominium / town

house or recreational models and requires few special considerations.

Retirement communities aimed at this " slow go " and the " no go "

markets are not only physical structures; they deliver a wide variety

of services. Almost all of these communities provide independent

living units with a package of service amenities that includes: meal

service; transportation programs; planned social, cultural and

recreational activities; maid and or laundry service; twenty four hour

emergency call systems, security programs and a limited access to

nursing staff.

Retirement communities that offer access to nursing care are

normally financed differently. Non care providers normally

are set up on a " rental only " basis and enter into leasing agreements

that vary from monthly to annually. The primary advantage of this type

of a program is that there is no need for a large capital outlay. The

disadvantage is that the residents are more subject to arbitrary

increases in the fees due to inflation or other variances.

The care providing community normally operates with an endowment

agreement when the resident begins occupancy. This is a large fee that

is generally not refunded to the residents if they die or leave the

community. The resident may receive a partial refund that declines

with the number of years of residence for a period of five to eight

years. In most cases, the residents also pay a continuing monthly fee.

In return for the endowment, the care providing community assumes

certain responsibilities relative to the residents for their

lifetime, including the responsibility for skilled nursing care. In

many early communities, the residents were guaranteed unlimited

skilled nursing care with no increase in the monthly fees. Lifecare

centers began to proliferate during the middle of the 1980's.

These centers are designed for elderly people who don't want

to have to worry about home maintenance and upkeep, who don't want to

worry about cooking their own meals and who don't want to worry about

continued health care costs in an emergency.

Linnon (1986) describes one of these facilities. A retired couple

can pay an up-front security deposit of between $ 8,000.00 and

$ 15,000.00 that is fully refundable, along with a monthly fee of

about $ 1500.00. This entitles them to two meals a day in a hotel

style dining room, transportation to local activities, access to a

library and cocktail lounge and housekeeping service once a week.

Health services are available at this facility, but these fees are

separate from the organization fees. In 1989, The Marriott Corporation

will complete one of the first for-profit Lifecare Centers at Canyon

Lakes in San Ramon, California. The entrance fee or endowment is

$ 125,000.00, of which 90% is refundable. The fee guarantees all of

the social amenities plus health care for the rest of the resident's

life.

Penn (1987) states that the average retiree today is much

different than ten years ago. If you are a typical retiree today, you

are in your mid to late 50's, socially and physically active. This

group is looking for an outlet for their social, financial and physical

needs.

All of these communities are not successful, as Paulson (1987)

points out. The facility called the " Cloisters " which advertised

"Life Care ... Assured " , is in receivership with $ 14,000,000.00 in

outstanding debts.

The 81 residents that paid an entrance fee of between $ 50,000 to

$ 100,000 each to be admitted, have a roof over their heads, but no

daily meal services, no medical services and none of the other

amenities that were promised to them.

A three year wait to be admitted to one of the better Lifecare

centers is not uncommon. Applicants are expected to be in reasonably

good health and able to live unassisted.

Langdon (1988) discusses the high cost at one of the Lifecare

centers named Duncaster. He states that moving into this complex is

like buying a very expensive insurance policy. A person moving into

Duncaster would pay a minimum of $ 77,935.00 up front and $ 1699.00 per

month. A resident that stays no longer than three months can receive a

refund of all of their initial payment. After three months a prorated

amount will be returned up to forty months; after which no refund is

available. Duncaster's grounds are lavish, including seventy two acres

of woodlands and grassy knolls. Also included in this retirement oasis

are a greenhouse, library, woodworking shop, and an auditorium.

Less affluent facilities also exist. A company called Cardinal

Properties of Columbus, Ohio is building congregate care facilities.

These facilities do not have the expensive " endowment " fee, or the

greenhouse, but it does have a community dining area, beauty shop,

transportation to local areas, and a monthly rental fee of only

$ 799.00 per month.

There is also a movement towards " mainstreaming " the elderly

back into the center of the community by renovating existing structures

and converting them into Lifecare centers. This keeps the elderly in

circulation by locating them in the center of a small downtown area in

an old hotel and renovating it to suit their needs.

Astrachan ( 1986 ) reports that not everyone in a continuing care

community is there to relax. Dr. James A. Hagans moved to Covenant

Village with his parents to facilitate their care. Hagans, 58, cares

for his parents, aged 92 and 93, who are not invalids but require

assistance in their daily activities. He purchased two of the units

adjacent to each other and had a door cut between them.

He chose Covenant Village because, " As your needs increase, the

support is already here and readily available." 50% of the initial

investment of the approximately $40,000.00 is set aside to defray the

costs of skilled nursing care. Should the tenant utilize more that the

original amount, they are required to pay for the additional services.

In 1986 there were 600 Lifecare communities in the United States.

The number is estimated to increase to 1500 by the year 2000, according

to the accounting firm of Laventhol and Horwath in Philadelphia. Most

of these will be run by real estate developers or by church affiliated

and other nonprofit organizations. Dwight (1985) states that people

considering retirement communities consider the availability and the

quality of healthcare services as major criteria to guide their decisions.

Dwight performed a study involving more than 7000 respondents

across the country. Many aspects of the sociophysical environment

were examined. Physical assessment, preventive healthcare, mental

assessment and the care for the terminally ill was examined in the

broad area of healthcare.

Barber shops, Beauty shops, Physical fitness rooms and jacuzzis

were assessed in the are a of social, recreational, and cultural

amenities. Homemaker, laundry service and maid service were the areas

of general service that were considered.

Based on the questions relating to maid service, jacuzzis, etc.,

this was a survey of the relatively affluent individuals whose annual

income was found to be greater than $ 20,000.00 per year.

The results of the survey indicated that approximately 50% of the

population surveyed felt that nursing home services must be accessible

to them. 19% would not want a nursing home on-site, and 25% would not

want not want it off-site.

Respondents showed a strong desire for related health services

to be available. These alternative services consisted of in-home

assistance by registered nurse or having a registered nurse on-call

24 hours a day. 66% stated that indicated that they preferred the

full time access to a nurse.

Physical assessments were found to be more important to the

residents of the Eastern part of the country rather than the Western.

Overall 61% said that some type of routine physical exam was necessary.

Dwight also found that the availability of recreational, social

and cultural amenities were important to the decision of where to

relocate. Barber shops and Beauty shops were considered a "must have" in

14%, 22%, and 33% of the population in the Eastern, Southwest and the

West respectively.

Stark differences were found with respect to physical fitness

rooms and jacuzzis. Only 10%, 18% and 45% of the respondents in the

Eastern, Southwestern and West felt that these were necessary.

Little difference was found relative to the availability of

convenience stores or snack bars across the country with only an

average of 20% favoring this option.

The concept of safety and security was also examined. Emergency

call systems were felt to be a requirement by an average of 33% of all

of the respondents while over 35% of the population felt that there

must be a uniformed security guard present at all times.

General services such as access to public transportation, private

limousine service, cleaning and laundry service showed a mixed results

with variances attributed to the preretirement utilization of these

services.

The rapid inflation of the late 1970's brought many of these

early communities to the brink of financial collapse because the costs

for the unlimited nursing care increased far greater than their

capacity to pay. Modern care providing communities are now limiting

the amount of skilled nursing care that they provide to some fixed

dollar amount.

Wright (1987) reports on a relatively recent phenomenon called

the Board and Care. This particular project was built in a former

convent and financed with a $250,000 dollar federal grant. Kate

Sloan, a housing specialist for the American Association of Retired

Persons, calls this project marvelous because it offers a kind of care

that is not widely available elsewhere. Mary's House offers room and

board but no health care to its residents, who pay less than half of

the national rate for nursing home care. For $1200.00 dollars per

month, residents get three home cooked meals a day, 24 - hour

supervision, and personalized rooms similar to those in college

dormitories.

Charles Gilchrest, former Montgomery county executive, states

that this board and care is a perfect example of the housing that we

can develop as an alternative to prevent the premature or needless

institutionalization of our frail senior citizens.

Other experts see a key role played by nonprofit board and care

units in meeting the needs of the middle class elderly who can neither

afford costly alternatives nor live safely on their own.

" The big word today is deinstitutionalization," says Ms. Brady,

founder of Mary's House. " That's what this is. When you take people

out of a nursing home facility and into a homelike setting like this,

it's the accomplishment of a goal unto itself. "

Ms. Brady says that the disappointing search for adequate housing

for her mother led her to become an activist in the field. Ms. Brady

was able to convince the Archdiocese of Washington D.C. to lease it to

the low income housing group that she heads. She then obtained a

federal grant for building renovations, with additional funding

generated by local fund raising activities and contributions. Much of

the food comes through free state programs and nearly all of its

furniture was donated by local churches.

The home's 15 vacancies were filled as soon as they were available

and a sizeable waiting list has been developed.

Summary

The population of America is aging. This will bring new

opportunities to the housing and community development industries.

These markets are very capital and management intensive, and are not

merely a matter of diversification of ordinary home building

techniques. They require complex planning and dedicated concern for

the aging and their special requirements.

 

Chapter III

Study and Analysis of Data

Results

Of the 50 surveys distributed, 33 were returned. This is a return

rate of 66%. With n = 33, the mean age was 71 with a standard

deviation of 17. The median age was 74 and the mode was 80. In terms

of background information, 61% owned a car, 52% owned their homes and

19% rented their homes. 88% enjoyed the changing of the seasons and

16% were employed.

The relatively high return rate was due to two factors. The

instrument and the facilitators. The instrument included food coupons

worth $ 1.00 dollar at a local McDonald's restaurant. The facilitators

at each site personally saw to the completion and the return of the

surveys to the author. 91% of the respondents favored a single story

dwelling, 3% two stories, and 6% greater than two. 48% favored a

bedroom / kitchen while 33% favored a bedroom only. 97% required a

private bathroom and 82% said that they would not like to share their

room with any other people.

These data support the same conclusions reported in the

Dwight (1985) study and the journal information on utilization. That

is, the respondents preferred an apartment where they could prepare

meals for themselves, indicating the necessity of kitchen facilities.

They also requested that a common kitchen or cafeteria type restaurant

be available for the majority of their dining requirements.

This is also reflected in the occupancy rates, i.e., those units

with the integral kitchen facilities are the most often rented, while

those that do not are not as popular.

Relative to nearby services, the responses were as follows; 14.2%

requested medical care, 13.7% said drug store, 13.2% said bank. 11.7%

wanted a Church, 11.2% wanted a food store and 7.6% wanted a library.

7.1% said bus stop, 6.6% Mcdonald's, 5.6% said public park, 5.1% said

laundry, and 4.1% said Wendy's.

This information is in concert with what Dwight says about medical

care. 14.2% of the population stated that they preferred medical care

to be located within a three block radius of the facility. This

instrument did not examine the type of medical care, i.e., long term,

physical assessment, etc., but judging from the age of the majority of

the recipients, this author believes that they meant medical care

that would normally be delivered by a General Practitioner in the

office setting as opposed to a long term care facility.

72% favored three meals a day, 25% favored two. Cafeteria style

was the preferred serving style with 49% family style was 43% and

restaurant style was 6%. Preferred Beverages were milk 33%, coffee

32%, and tea 19%.

Special diets that were rated were low cholesterol 30% low sodium

25%, low fat 23%, and weight watcher 19%. Of specific ethnic foods

tested, Polish was 18%, German, Hungarian, Irish, Kosher, and Oriental

were 15%, with Arabic, American, and Italian at 7%. 48% thought the

cost of the meals should be included in the rental fees, 33% said cash,

12% said voucher or meal ticket and 7% said credit cards should be

considered.

Meal preferences relative to frequency and type were what the

author expected for this population. This population consisted mostly

of first generation Americans with strong ethnic and religious

backgrounds.

In terms of security and safety, 37% favored a security guard, 27%

said name tags, and 18% said ID badges. Unlimited visitation by family

and friends was greater than 29%, while visitation by clergy was

described as 25%.

Dwight's survey also indicated a strong desire for safety and

security. She states that 35% of her respondents felt that it was

necessary to have a uniformed security guard on the premises, compared

to 37% of this author's respondents. This may be in part due to the

fact that primary material possessions, i.e., photographs, furniture,

etc., acquire an elevated sense of importance or a " This is

all I have left " scenario. Therefore, if the elderly have made the

transition from their own homes, they want to be certain that their

remaining valuables will be well protected.

Should married couples share the same room?, 100% said yes; Should

unmarried couples?; 55% said no, 18% said they didn't know, 27% said

yes. Overnight visiting was favored by 64%, 12% said no and 24% said

they didn't know or that it depended on the situation and the

facilities available.

55% of the respondents said that unmarried couples should not be

allowed to stay in the same room. This is due, I believe, to the

prevailing age of the respondents, with its mean being 71 years and

57.7% of the respondents being 67 years of age or older.

25% said that pets should not be allowed. 19% said that birds

were acceptable, 17% said dogs, 24% fish, 14% turtles and 10% said

cats.

These data imply that 75% of the respondents were not opposed to

pets at the facility. However, the majority of them, 35%, stated that

they preferred " low maintenance ", pets. These were pets that

required little or no outdoor exercise.

The important aspect here is not so much owning a pet, but access to

the pet function which is the source of comfort and unconditional

acceptance that a pet can confer on its owner.

Less that 36% said that they would be interested in working at

either volunteer or part time work. This is due their relative incomes

and lifestyles during their years in the workplace. Volunteering is

out of place in their normal social and age group.

Extracurricular activities were rated as follows: Bus tours were

#1 at 13%, cards was #2. Gardening and live performers were tied for

#3 with 9.4%. Crafts and live theater were #4 at 8.7%, bingo was #5 at

8.1%, books were #6 at 6%, bowling and fishing were tied for #7. Golf,

quilting, and sewing were #8 at 3.4%, estate planning was #9 at 2.7%,

while boating was #10 at 2%.

The selection of these activities is typical for upper lower and

lower middle to upper middle income respondents with an estimated

annual income of less than $ 20,000.00.

Golfing, boating and estate planning were notably low on the preference

scale, while bus tours and card playing were the highest.

Overall, these results were representative of a group of people

who were more interested in their own safety and security than self-

actualized activities as volunteering. I believe that this is due to

their strong work ethics and ethnic backgrounds. Nothing was ever

handed to them. They had to work hard for everything that they had,

and therefore did not readily advocate the " giving " of anything to

others that did not earn it directly.

 

Chapter IV

Conclusions

Based on the available data, the ideal facility would be

designed in the following manner.

It would consist of a single story dwelling with each unit having

a private bath and bedroom and rudimentary kitchen facilities. Primary

services located within a three block area would be General

Practitioner delivered medical care, a drug store, bank and library.

Security would be provided by a uniformed security guard and all of the

residents would have either name tags or pins. Family friends, and

clergy would have unlimited visiting privileges and special overnight

accommodations would be made available for family emergencies. Meals

would be provided three times per day and included in the rental cost

if desired. If not, a cash system or meal ticket program could be

arranged. Coffee, Tea, and Milk would be provided with meals with

alcoholic beverages available on special occasions for an additional

cost. Special diets would be made available if recommended by a family

physician. Various types of ethnic food would be available on an

intermittent basis. Pets would only be allowed in segregated areas of

the facility. Part time and volunteer work would be made available to

those residents who desired and were able to perform it.

The data that were generated by these surveys surprised me. I

did not expect the "elderly" to have the same types of preferences that

"normal" people have. I have also shown that if you wish to design a

facility for the individuals that we consider to be the "elderly", we

must consider a wide range of variables including the physical, social

and financial characteristics of the target population and not just

age.

Special Thanks

Special thanks to Mrs. Julia Horvat and Mrs. Leona Kirk, who were,

respectively, the Ohio and Michigan survey facilitators whose

assistance made this project possible.

 

References

Astrachan, Anthony. I like myself better for taking care of my Parents. Medical Economics. November 24, 1986. Pages 52 - 57.

Life-Care Retirement Living - An Attractive Option for Today's Active Retirees. Barron's. February 4, 1985, Page 66.

Dwight, Maria B. Affluent elderly want to live where quality care's already available. Modern Healthcare. April 26, 1985. Pages 74 -76.

Gaskie, Margaret. Sheltered Independence: Life After 65. Architectural Record. February, 1985, Pages 95 - 115.

Goldberg, Susan. Nursing Homes: State fined 20 %. Detroit Free Press April 27, 1986, Pages 1b - 6b.

Gray, V. Katherine. Exploding Some Myths about Housing for the Elderly. Real_Estate_Review. 15, Pages 91 -93.

Gurland, Barry. Reevaluating the Place of Evaluation in Planning for Alternatives to Institutional Care for the Elderly. Journal_of_Social_Issues. 37, Pages 51 - 70.

Henderson, Michael J. Best of Both Worlds. Mortgage Banking. December 1985. Pages 27 - 38.

Hoffman, Peter. Growing Market for Housing the Elderly Explored. Architectural Record. June 1986, Page 31.

Kagan, Jerome. Psychology: An Introduction. 1974 Edition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Pages 356 - 358.

Langdon, Philip. Housing an Aging Nation. Atlantic. April 1988, Pages 67 - 69.

Linnon, Nancy. How you can live it up to the end. U.S. News and World Report, July 21, 1986, Pages 48 - 49.

Parmiter, Don. Developing the Over 50's Market. Urban Land. June 1984, 43, Pages 2 - 7.

Paulson, Morton D. Sizing up Life Care: Don't hand over your cash without reading the fine print, and talking to the residents. Changing Times. May 1987, Pages 65 - 69.

Penn, Daniel M. Today's Younger Retirees, A New Active Generation. Barron's. January 26, 1987, Page 47.

Rodgers, Buck. The IBM Way. 1986, Harper and Row. Pages 9 - 21.

Seiler, Stephen R. How to develop retirement communities for profit. Real Estate Review. Fall 1986. Pages 70 - 75.

Wright, Robert. A Model for our Rapidly Aging Society. American Banker. October 9, 1987. Pages 10 - 23.

 

 

                             

The style manual for this proposal is

            The_Publication_Manual of_the_American_Psychological_Association.

    Second Edition, Pridemark Press, Inc.

                  Baltimore, 1974.